同床异梦

US smears China’s Huangyan Dao nature reserve amid Philippine provocations; Washington’s verbal backing offers no real support, fuels tensions: expert_我的网站

A |     据现代快报报道：近日，多家媒体报道称，《消失的她》原型、泰国孕妇坠崖案当事人@王暖暖summer与俞某冬至今仍未离婚，甚至有媒体称王暖暖可能要到70岁才能离婚。    

    An aerial drone photo taken on May 2, 2026 shows reefs in the territorial waters of China's Huangyan Dao in the South China Sea. Photo: Xinhua
Amid a new round of Philippine hype over its so-called territorial claims involving China's Huangyan Dao, the US State Department on Saturday, in a statement, smeared China's Huangyan Dao National Nature Reserve as "destabilizing" and pledged support for its ally. A Chinese expert said Washington is encouraging Manila to disrupt regional peace while offering little more than hollow verbal assurances, further undermining stability in the South China Sea.
The statement, published on the State Department's official website and attributed to spokesperson Thomas Pigott, claimed that the US "rejects China's ongoing attempts to enforce its destabilizing 'national nature reserve'" at Huangyan Dao.
Pigott also alleged that the reserve would "deny Filipino fishermen access to their traditional fishing ground as reflected in the 2016 Arbitral Award."
It is absurd for the US, a country that is not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), to pass judgment on the Huangyan Dao National Nature Reserve, Yang Xiao, a research fellow at the Institute of Peaceful Development under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times on Sunday.
The US has neither jurisdiction in the South China Sea nor the standing to judge regional affairs. Its allegation of the reserve at this time is merely intended to echo the Philippines' latest hype surrounding Huangyan Dao, Yang said.
At a time when the broader China-US relationship is moving toward an easing of tensions, attempts by certain US officials to encourage provocations out of narrow political interests run counter to the overall trend, Yang said.
Pigott further smeared the reserve as "another unilateral attempt by China to use dubious environmental and legal pretexts," which he claimed was intended to advance China's territorial and maritime claims in the South China Sea "at the expense of its neighbors."
"The United States stands with our Ally, the Philippines, in support of a free and open Indo-Pacific," Pigott claimed.
The expert added that the statement also invoked the unlawful and invalid 2016 "South China Sea Arbitral Award" as a pretext, seeking to portray China as a destabilizing force in the region and mislead the international community.
The US statement comes as Manila has sought to advance its claims over Huangyan Dao through various means, including by delimitation of the so-called "baselines of the territorial sea" of the Chinese territory of Huangyan Dao. The Chinese Foreign Ministry on July 31 described the move as "illegal, null and void."
Yang said that amid a broader retrenchment of its global strategy, the US is seeking to encourage countries including Japan and the Philippines to stage regional provocations and disrupt stability. Such tactics include organizing joint military exercises and tolerating provocative actions by Manila in the South China Sea.
However, Washington is no longer capable of offering the Philippines substantive support and can provide little more than rhetorical backing, Yang said. Such statements amount to words on paper and have no practical effect, he added.
China's State Council approved the establishment of the Huangyan Dao National Nature Reserve in September 2025. China has since conducted multiple scientific surveys in the area.
On August 1, China issued management measures for the reserve, prohibiting unauthorized fishing and mining, the harvesting or excavation of corals, coral reefs and giant clams, as well as other activities that damage rare marine species or the reserve's natural ecosystems.
China has also discovered a globally rare coral reef growth structure-type marine blue hole at Huangyan Dao. Preliminary geochronological analyses suggest that the blue hole formed at least 3,200 years ago, while surveys have found rich biodiversity in its surrounding waters. The finding is considered further evidence of the effectiveness and necessity of China's ecological protection measures at Huangyan Dao.
。1月13日，王暖暖的代理律师、江苏致邦律师事务所律师柳锦目告诉@现代快报记者，所谓“到70岁才能离婚”只是一种推定，目前王暖暖离婚案已经在南京秦淮法院立案。因俞某冬在泰国服刑，该离婚案已经层报至最高人民法院，开庭时间、开庭方式目前都未确定，但大概率为视频开庭。来源：现代快报被丈夫推下悬崖六年后，她还在起诉离婚此前，电影《消失的她》在上映后引发热议，其原型是一位名为王暖暖的南京姑娘。2019年6月9日，怀孕5个月的王暖暖和丈夫俞某冬到泰国乌汶府帕登国家公园看日出，在准备回去的途中，俞某冬将她从34米高的悬崖推下，致使全身17处骨折，但生命力顽强的王暖暖奇迹般被救活。案发到现在已经过去快五年，王暖暖之后又经历了艰难的康复、再次创业等，可这些年，始终有件事困扰着她：她和杀害自己的俞某冬的婚姻关系还没有解除。王暖暖（图片来源：湖南日报）坠崖后，她因需手术治疗，不得已将孩子引产，并被医生宣判失去生育能力。2024年8月，37岁的王暖暖做了妈妈。

B | 这被她形容为“奇迹”，现在这个孩子，她称是用辅助生殖技术孕育的。经过三次审理，2023年6月，泰国皇家法庭公布了三审即终审判决结果，俞某冬蓄意谋杀未遂罪名成立，判处有期徒刑三十三年四个月。

C | 刑事案件终结后，2023年9月，王暖暖向南京市秦淮区法院提起离婚诉讼。王暖暖的代理律师柳锦目告诉记者，法院非常重视，当天就立案。已上报至最高法，大概率为视频开庭荔枝新闻报道截图柳锦目称，这个离婚案之所以迟迟开不了庭，是“卡”在程序上。他解释，通常离婚案的被告如果在境外，法院会把司法文书用域外送达的方式送给对方，通知被告前来开庭。如果被告在国内服刑，法官可以到监狱里开庭。而俞某冬是在境外服刑，泰国监狱无法把人放回来开庭，国内的法院也无法到泰国监狱里开庭。柳锦目从主审法官处了解到，该案面临的情况属国内首例，无先例可循，只能沟通和协调。柳锦目说，目前该案已通过最高人民法院国际合作局联系泰国的外交部门和司法部门，目前初定方案为视频开庭。柳锦目认为，视频开庭是最合适的开庭方式，但最终能否实现，仍是未知数。王暖暖称，因为尚未离婚，且在婚姻存续期间生下孩子，2024年9月她在为孩子上户口时，被告知孩子生父只能是俞某冬。王暖暖无法接受这一结果，暂未给孩子上户口。2024年12月5日，柳锦目介绍，当地户籍部门正按照非婚生类型为王暖暖的孩子办理户口，目前仍在审批中。荔枝新闻报道截图法律上的这个困境有解决方案吗？根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的规定，开庭前，需要把诉讼文书送达给被告人。

D | 这起案件中的俞某冬，目前在泰国的监狱，这样要如何送达？东南大学法学院副教授博士生导师冯煜清表示，涉外送达目前来讲，一般看符不符合“海牙送达公约”。如果符合，有一套明确的送达方式，但泰国不属于海牙送达公约的缔约国，所以不适用公约的相关规定。但是我国已经跟泰国签署了司法协作的协议，根据协议，泰国的官方尤其是司法服务机构有义务转交我们的送达件。冯教授介绍，虽然两国有司法协作协议，但对送达的时间没有做详细规定。在送达之后，还面临一个更严峻的问题，根据法律规定，当事人原则上要出庭。南京师范大学法学院教授陈爱武表示，离婚不可能通过单方的意思就能形成。根据相关法律规定，离婚有两种途径，一是双方共同到民政部门进行登记，经过冷静期之后，拿离婚证。另一个就是向法院起诉离婚。

E | 王暖暖的案件之所以出现问题，也是出于程序公正的要求，要保障双方当事人的程序权利，辩论权等。同时，这起案件也面临着以何种方式来实现开庭的问题。荔枝新闻报道截图形式上的问题，怎么开庭？是否用线上的方式？但线上方式又需要双方共同同意。现在被告在泰国监狱，涉及在域外的情况。

F | 冯教授表示，虽然本案中的情况在国内没有先例可循，但可以做一些创造性的尝试。《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》中规定，被告经过传唤，无正当理由拒不到庭的，可以缺席判决。一般来说，当事人被监禁不能参与庭审，是一个正当理由，但在本案中的情况极其特殊。

G | 如果他以自己被监禁而不能参与诉讼为由，来拖延王暖暖的离婚诉讼，这样的一种行为本身就有滥用程序权利之嫌，如果是滥用程序权利，那么还能否构成正当事由，我想是值得商榷的。之后，如果能顺利进入到开庭程序，在实体法上判决离婚，并没有太大争议。来源：荔枝新闻王暖暖说：“马上就要过年了，我还是希望尽早能够离婚，这是一个多米诺骨牌的效应，离了婚以后很多事情才能迎刃而解。”极目新闻综合现代快报、湖南日报、广州日报、荔枝新闻、南京零距离（来源：极目新闻）更多精彩资讯请在应用市场下载“极目新闻”客户端，未经授权请勿转载，欢迎提供新闻线索，一经采纳即付报酬。24小时报料热线027-86777777。

Current article:http://www.tibiantasangnenti.buzz/dp0/ucfncea.xlsx

Published on:16:13:08