五感图
苹果诉OpenAI未点名Jony Ive_我的网站

一 |

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi attends a Nagasaki Peace Ceremony to commemorate the 81st anniversary of the atomic bombing at the Peace Park in Nagasaki City on August 9, 2026. Photo: VCGJapanese officials and members of the public urged the government to uphold the Three Non-Nuclear principles and pursue a security policy that does not rely on nuclear weapons, as Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi maintained an ambiguous stance on the long-held policy during a speech on Sunday marking the 81st anniversary of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki.
Chinese experts noted that, similar to her ambiguous remarks at the memorial ceremony in Hiroshima, Takaichi stopped short of making a clear commitment to maintaining the Three Non-Nuclear Principles in the future, as her government's stance on nuclear issues has sparked concern and anger among the Japanese public. They also warned that, given Japan's lack of thorough reflection on its wartime aggression, Tokyo's moves to dilute the Three Non-Nuclear Principles should raise alarm across the international community.
"Our country firmly upholds the three non-nuclear principles, and under the pledge that 'Nagasaki shall be the last city to suffer a nuclear attack,' we are promoting realistic and practical initiatives toward the realization of a world without nuclear weapons," Takaichi claimed, according to the Japan Times.
But unlike previous prime ministers, many of whom had pledged that Japan would "continue to uphold" the principles, Takaichi merely described the government's current position without making an explicit commitment about the future, per the report.
As Hiroshima observed the 81st anniversary of the US atomic bombing of the city on Thursday, Takaichi also emphasized that Japan pledges to achieve a world free of nuclear weapons while upholding the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, despite Japanese media noting that she has left the door open for future revisions.
Takaichi's remarks in Hiroshima and Nagasaki that Japan upholds the three non-nuclear principles were largely seen as a reaffirmation of the country's existing policy position rather than a pledge to maintain the principles in the future, Liu Jiangyong, a professor at the Institute of International Studies at Tsinghua University, told the Global Times.
Liu said that currently, some Japanese officials' dangerous remarks on nuclear have sparked criticism among Japanese society. He pointed out that Takaichi only referred to Japan's current adherence to the principles, without explicitly committing to preserving them going forward. Her subsequent focus on broader goals such as achieving a "world without nuclear weapons" has further fueled questions over her actual policy intentions.
Japanese Defense Minister Shinjiro Koizumi claimed in an online program released in July that discussions on nuclear weapons were necessary to strengthen Japan's defense capabilities, according to Kyodo News. While acknowledging that the issue was difficult to discuss in Japan, he claimed it was something that "could not be avoided."
Opposition to the Takaichi administration's nuclear-related moves has emerged across Japan, including from local governments, media organizations and civil society groups.
According to statistics from the Japanese Diet, at least 128 local assemblies across the country had submitted written opinions to the central government or parliament between Takaichi's inauguration on October 21 last year and July 28 this year, calling for the country's Three Non-Nuclear Principles to be upheld, according to Xinhua News Agency.
In an interview with the AFP, 82-year-old Satoshi Tanaka, a campaigner who survived the 1945 attack on Hiroshima expressed frustration that current political leaders like Takaichi are focusing on military capacity at the expense of diplomacy.
"There is so much talk about national security. What about building peace through diplomacy?" he said.
Responding to a question concerning the Japanese authorities are rebuilding Japan's war machine, seeking to revise the Three Non-Nuclear Principles, and pursuing nuclear sharing with the US, even the possession of nuclear weapons, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said on Thursday that the devastation and tragedies brought by nuclear weapons should never repeat themselves. That said, the particular context of the nuclear explosions should all the more be remembered and the lessons of Japanese militarism's aggression and expansion must forever serve as an alarm.
The Tokyo's moves on nuclear policy have also raised concerns in the international community.
Russia considers the rhetoric of Japanese authorities regarding the need for Japan to revise its Three Non-Nuclear Principles provocative and unacceptable, Russian Ambassador to Japan Nikolai Nozdrev said in an interview with RIA Novosti, which was published on Saturday.
Responding to Koizumi's remarks on nuclear discussion, Nozdrev said "This is the first time in Japan's history, as the only country to have suffered atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, that a sitting defense minister has publicly called for lifting the 'taboo' on discussions related to nuclear weapons. We consider such rhetoric from official Tokyo provocative and absolutely unacceptable."
Japan has yet to fully reckon with its wartime aggression, thus any attempt by Tokyo to move toward acquiring nuclear weapons could pose serious risks to regional peace and global security, Lü Chao, an expert on the Korean Peninsula issue at the Liaoning Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times.
Such concerns have become more pronounced as Japan increasingly portrays China as a major security challenge while highlighting perceived threats from other countries, against such a backdrop, any further steps to dilute the three non-nuclear principles are likely to heighten concerns internationally, particularly among countries that suffered from Japanese aggression during World War II, said Lü.
。 IT之家 7 月 21 日消息,在上周末(7 月 19 日)的 Power On 时事通讯中,彭博社的马克 · 古尔曼(Mark Gurman)指出,苹果出于多方面因素考虑,在指控 OpenAI 的 41 页诉状中,并未点名前苹果公司设计师乔纳森 · 伊夫(Jony Ive)。
苹果公司于 7 月 12 日向美国加利福尼亚北区联邦地区法院提起诉讼,指控 OpenAI 及其硬件子公司 io Products 通过挖走苹果员工、获取内部文件和接触供应商等方式,盗用苹果商业秘密。

二 |
IT之家援引博文介绍,在诉讼文件中,苹果公司将矛头对准了以下几人:
Tang Tan:指控其在苹果任职期间(前 iPhone 产品设计副总裁)提前泄露供应商信息及机密,离职后诱导应聘者携带原型机、CAD 图纸等加入 OpenAI,并系统性转移供应链资源。 Chang Liu:指控其在职期间指导现任苹果同事规避安全审查复制机密文件,面试前传授未发布项目复习要点,并建议改用私人通讯工具(如 LINE)进行违规交流。 Yu-Ting “Alyssa” Peng:在仍任职苹果期间,持续向已跳槽至 OpenAI 的刘畅泄露苹果内部保密硬件项目的核心信息,包括项目进展、供应商决策、工程细节等关键保密内容
古尔曼认为,苹果在诉状中未点名伊夫,其中最主要的原因是苹果公司认为关联性有限。伊夫通过设计公司 LoveFrom 参与 OpenAI 硬件项目,但不负责招聘,也不处理日常运营。
第二个原因是伊夫和乔布斯遗孀 Laurene Powell Jobs 私交甚好,古尔曼指出 Powell Jobs 曾投资于 io Products,并且仍然支持 LoveFrom。
Powell Jobs 虽然不是苹果董事会成员,也不是公司最大股东之一,但“Jobs”这个姓氏在库比蒂诺仍具影响力。

三 | 消息称苹果公司在起诉 OpenAI 时,曾考虑是否要把伊夫写入其中,最终因为这一层关系而放弃。
第三个原因是舆论观感。伊夫于 2019 年离开苹果,并在 2022 年前担任付费顾问。报道指出在库克执掌苹果公司后,库克更重视运营效率、制造和成本纪律,设计不再居于核心位置。
古尔曼认为如果苹果把伊夫拉入本次诉讼争议中,在法庭作证环节中,法官或者对方律师可能要求其回答对苹果设计地位变化的看法。
Current article:http://www.tibiantasangnenti.buzz/k4g2/np6m9t.doc
Published on:02:21:22
查看所有0条评论>>