正能量

多地彩票店刮刮乐售空，福彩体彩回应：供不应求，无管控通知_我的网站

如懿传

一 | Ilaiyaraaja has secured a significant legal win in his ongoing effort to safeguard his body of work. The Madras High Court has directed the makers of Dude to take out two of his compositions from the film. The tracks in question are Karutha Machan and Nooru Varusham, both of which were incorporated into the movie without seeking a formal nod from the celebrated composer.When classics collide with copyright concernsThe production house had asked for a short grace period to complete the removal process, but the court declined this request. The bench observed that any usage that affects the integrity and purity of Ilaiyaraaja’s original compositions cannot be permitted. With this observation in place, the judge has instructed the producers to file a detailed response to the petition and has scheduled the next hearing for January 7.Arguments over ownership and authorisationRepresenting Mythri Movie Makers, senior counsel P V Balasubramaniam maintained that the team had lawfully acquired the rights through Sony Music, which is said to be the present owner of the songs. He highlighted that the tracks were created before changes were made to the Copyright Act of 1957. Under the earlier version of the law, the first holder of the copyright was the producer of the original film. According to his submission, those producers had eventually transferred the rights to Sony Music, which then permitted reuse. Ilaiyaraaja’s side, however, has continued to hold that the reuse of his work without his personal consent infringes not only on economic interests but also on his moral rights. These rights protect the relationship between the creator and the work, especially when it comes to how the composition is presented, interpreted, or altered in newer contexts.This is not the first time the composer and the production banner have clashed. Earlier this year, Mythri Movie Makers faced similar legal trouble after Ilaiyaraaja objected to the use of his songs in Good Bad Ugly, the Ajith Kumar starrer. The court had issued an order restraining the team from using the contested tracks, which led to the film being temporarily unavailable on its streaming platform. The makers later replaced the songs with background music for the digital version.A ruling that echoes far beyond one filmThe latest order serves as a reminder to filmmakers and production companies that acquiring rights from a music label may not always be the final step in securing lawful usage. Questions of attribution, creative control and proper handling of classic compositions remain central in disputes involving iconic works. For composers, it creates a renewed sense of agency over how their music is presented in contemporary cinema. For the audience, this ruling might influence how nostalgia driven filmmaking evolves, with creators possibly choosing more original reinterpretations to avoid legal entanglements.Also Read: Pradeep Ranganathan thanks fans after Dude earns his 100-crore hat-trick。

二 | 近日，不少网友发帖称，最近自己所在城市的刮刮乐“一票难求”，即开型彩票缺货情况较为严重。此前网上有传言称国家正在管控即开型彩票的发售情况，记者向中国体彩和中国福彩进行求证，双方均表示目前没有收到管控通知，缺货是因为供不应求。网友们上传的各地彩票站缺货情况4月23日至25日，海报新闻记者走访了北京市东城区和朝阳区的几家体育彩票和福利彩票站点，发现即开型彩票确实存在缺货情况。“平时就指望着卖刮刮乐能挣点钱，我这两个月都断了两回货了。”在东城区一家临街的彩票站点，记者注意到即开型彩票的展示柜里空空如也。

三 | 彩票店老板告诉记者，这次断货已经有一个多星期了。在和彩票店老板交流中，记者了解到，目前，体彩和福彩的即开型彩票主要靠各站点的老板自行在官方网络渠道进行“抢票”。“但是现在官方也不放票了，想抢也抢不着。我们这属于临街的小微店，主要就靠着刮刮乐挣钱。”彩票店老板说。彩票店老板告诉记者，即开型彩票紧缺的情况大概是从去年年底开始的，“过去在网上订票都随便定，卖得不好的我们都不定，现在不行了，想抢都抢不到，没有票。

四 | ”除了北京地区，记者在社交平台搜索关键词“刮刮乐缺货”，发现湖南、河南、广西、浙江等地也出现了不同程度的断货情况。4月11日，羊城晚报记者走访发现，广东广州线下多个店铺没有“刮刮乐”可售。对此，店家的解释是因为过于火热而导致的全国性缺货。4月10日中午，越牛新闻记者走访浙江绍兴城区多家彩票店，发现体彩和福彩门店都出现了缺货、断货的情况，不少店主只能靠囤货和借来维持店面运营。此前，有部分网友议论，即开型彩票缺货是因为国家出台了相关的管控措施。记者也了解到，2023年10月，财政部发布公告称，停止销售41款即开型福利彩票。这一信息是否表示即开型彩票货源紧缺是受到相关部门的管控？就这一问题，记者向中国福彩和中国体彩进行了求证。“我们没有接到管控的通知。主要是因为印刷供不上销售，所以即开型彩票近期可能有一些短缺，过段时间会好的。”中国体彩工作人员表示。中国福彩的工作人员也给了记者同样的答案，即开型彩票目前广受消费者欢迎，断货是因为供不应求。“目前刮刮乐在全国都处于供不应求的状态，卖的很好。消费者想要买到刮刮乐的话可以多去几家站点看看。”依据规定，即开型彩票在印制等流程方面管理严格，有关机构要先报批及预订彩票印制的数额数量，继而再发行上市。